Yesterday, I posted excerpts from a classic book on communicating about technology or science: The Cluetrain Manifesto, by Rick Levine, Christopher Locke, Doc Searls and David Weinberger (Perseus Books, New York, 1999). One of my favorite screeds from the book covered the inappropriate but common use of jargon:
Bob Epstein, then at Sybase, gave a well-received speech where he used the expression “extended enterprise client server.” Afterward, people were asked if they could recall the phrase. Most said they remembered hearing a bunch of buzz words; none could remember the phrase.
“This is because ‘extended enterprise client server’ is composed entirely of TechnoLatin, a vocabulary of vague but precise-sounding words that work like the blank tiles in Scrabble: you can use them anywhere but they have no value.
“TechnoLatin takes perfectly meaningful words and empties them. If language is a living organism, TechnoLatin words are like those pod people in the movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers. They look real, but they are not. And like the pod people, TechnoLatin has become the norm. Clarity is the exception when it should be the rule. Today we no longer make chips, circuit boards, computers, monitors and printers. We don’t even make products. Instead, we make solutions, a fatuous noun further bloated by empty modifiers such as total, full, seamless, industry standard, and state-of-the-art.
“Equally vague and common are platform, open, environment, and support when used as a verb. A veterinarian using TechnoLatin might say that a dog serves as a platform for sniffing, is an open environment for fleas and that it supports barking.”
Gable PR studied news releases issued during one week over PR Newswire and Business Wire. A new “solution” was promoted or touted every eight minutes on average. More than half the companies claimed to be “leading providers” of something, but never submitted evidence to support the claim.
PR firms and internal PR staff need to strive for clear communications in a human voice and advoid jargon. When clients insist on using favorite phrases against agency advice, the results can be damaging to both company and agency. One WSJ Interactive editor put it into perspective with this thoughtful response to a client-mandated pitch that used “solutions” and a few other TechnoLatin phrases: “No thanks, I’m done covering solutions…I filter out pitches with the word ‘solution’ or ‘solutions’ now…especially ones that are ‘customer-centric’ or ‘mission-critical.’ Please don’t write to me about solutions anymore…they’ve become a problem.”
The answer: the hard but rewarding work of positioning the client properly, then supporting the position with facts, evocative thoughts and even some personality — a proven way to break through the competitive clutter and build an organization’s image and reputation.
Posted by Tom Gable





