Archive for the ‘jargon’ Category

PR Jargon Train Keeps Rolling and Gaining Speed

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Posted by Tom Gable

David Meerman Scott analyzed 711,123 press releases distributed during 2008 by North American companies through Business Wire, Marketwire, GlobeNewswire, and PR Newswire. He filtered for 325 gobbledygook phrases and issued a report. The top 10: innovate, pleased to, unique, focused on, leading provider, commitment, partnership, new and improved, leverage, and 120 percent.

He did the same survey in 2006 and the top 10: next generation, flexible, robust, world class, scalable, easy to use, cutting edge, well positioned, mission critical, and market leading.

Amazingly, stamping out jargon and gobbledygook in news releases is kind of like going after hardier strains of cockroaches. In a post on April 14, we cited the bad buzz words identified by Inc. magazine and listed the words our research among major media had turned up as most offensive some five years ago. They were: solutions, leading, leading provider, leading edge, cutting edge, seamless, state-of-the-art, best-of-breed, robust, end-to-end, first mover, customer-centric, mission critical, turnkey.

I pulled out earlier research from 2001 when we had a web site called jargonfreeweb.com and a “Jargonator” program for analyzing the jargon content of news releases and ranking the news value on a 1 to 5 scale (from bottom of the bird cage to NYT and WSJ quality). At that time, the words most despised by the media were very close to the 2004 research but in a different order: solutions, first-mover, customer-centric, leading, leading provider, seamless, leading edge, cutting edge, end-to-end, mission critical, best-of-breed, robust, world class and scalable.

Scott’s list also included phrases that should be exorcised from news releases forever — “pleased to” and “proud to” – because they always introduce a self-serving quote written in corporate speak (labeled by some media as LAQs, or lame-ass quotes): To his list we would add “I’m excited to.”

Here is a sample LAQ from an actual news release:

“I am extremely excited to have XYZ join ABC’s technology team. His extensive experience in wireless communications and his deep passion for technology will enable ABC to reach new heights as the company continues to develop future generations of the world’s only complete end-to-end solution for wireless LAN monitoring and intrusion detection and prevention,” according to DEF, president and CEO. (Not only does no human being speak that way but you could have fun thinking about the between-the-line implications: “XYZ’s predecessor had terminal ennui and distaste for technology that kept us stuck at the same level for years.”). For more on LAQs, link here to “Looking Foolish With Lame Ass Quotes.”

The jargon train keeps rolling. New generations of PR people and companies enter the fray, all fresh-cheeked, eager and lacking in sophistication or imagination. They pick up where the previous generations left off and start touting leading edge, best-of-breed seamless solutions. Perhaps with more coverage by Inc. and additional national media, research by David Meerman Scott and involvement of other proselytes, the PR profession can derail the jargon train and soar into the future on the wings of well-crafted communications and authentic counsel.

<!–[endif]–>

Inc. Swats at Bad Buzz Words, Touts 15 Worth Using

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

 In a post called The Good, The Bad, and the Buzzy, Inc. takes a concise and sometimes humorous look at buzz words and jargon it would prefer never to see again. 

(From Inc.)

15 Business Buzzwords We Don’t Want to Hear

Actionable: A high-energy noun gone passive and flabby. Authenticity: Has become its own antonym through overuse. Best of breed: Try not thinking of springer spaniels. Brain dump: Why treat creativity like construction waste? Co-opetition: Business doesn’t need a version of frenemy. Disintermediate: Has the same number of syllables as “cut out the middleman” with none of the clarity. Incentivize: First, it’s not a word. Second, what’s wrong with motivate? Mindshare: Our psyches are not Florida condos. Offline: Annoying in meetings (“Let’s take this offline”). We’re already offline! We’re surrounded by human beings! Outside the box: A cliché about not thinking in clichés. Proactive: Ugly corporate-ese, but without a decent synonym. Anyone? Repurpose: You are recycling. Just say so. Solution: A shame, what has happened to this word. Synergy: This bastard child of synthesis and energy is godfather to every enigmatically named tech company. Value-add: Devalues the concept of value. Talk shouldn’t be quite this cheap.

Having been pitching for a world of jargon-free PR for a decade or more, I applaud Inc. for this fine piece. When we surveyed major media on words they hated most more than five years ago, they named: solutions, leading, leading provider, leading edge, cutting edge, seamless, state-of-the-art, best-of-breed, robust, end-to-end, first mover, customer-centric, mission critical, turnkey.

 

 

 

 

 

Quite a collection. As for best words? The media we talked to didn’t specify any favorite words, just a concept: provide newsworthy items, facts and good ideas, please.

 (From Inc.)

15 Business Buzzwords We Like

Angel: What better metaphor for the answer to an entrepreneur’s prayers? Bandwidth: The rare tech term that translates to human beings. Big Hairy Audacious Goal: Humor makes the phrase memorable; hyperbole makes it motivational. Core competency: Ruthlessly focuses the leader’s mind. Cube farm: Truthful but whimsical. Elevator pitch: A business drama in miniature. Empower: A little treacly, but also clear and authoritative. Frictionless: Great image for how processes should work. Just in time: Suggests not just efficiency but salvation. Killer app: Succinct, clear, intimidating. Knowledge worker: Judges employees not by the color of their collars but by the content of their brains. Learning organization: Celebrates both continuous improvement and humility. Management by walking around: Humble yet vivid. Push the envelope: A cliché we like. Must be the Right Stuff association. Stickiness: Perfectly describes content that compels users to return.

Inc. has always been one of our top targets. To get on their radar, I think we’ll give them an elevator pitch about our client who has angel financing, a BHAG and has empowered staff and provided the bandwidth to push the envelope in search of a new killer app with ultimate stickiness. This learning organization has knowledge workers who work frictionless and with great core competencies in their cube farm, where the CEO manages by walking around. Think they’ll buy?

 Posted by Tom Gable

Cluetrain Manifesto on Jargon — Solutions a Problem

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

Yesterday, I posted excerpts from a classic book on communicating about technology or science: The Cluetrain Manifesto, by Rick Levine, Christopher Locke, Doc Searls and David Weinberger (Perseus Books, New York, 1999). One of my favorite screeds from the book covered the inappropriate but common use of jargon:

Bob Epstein, then at Sybase, gave a well-received speech where he used the expression “extended enterprise client server.” Afterward, people were asked if they could recall the phrase. Most said they remembered hearing a bunch of buzz words; none could remember the phrase.

“This is because ‘extended enterprise client server’ is composed entirely of TechnoLatin, a vocabulary of vague but precise-sounding words that work like the blank tiles in Scrabble: you can use them anywhere but they have no value.

“TechnoLatin takes perfectly meaningful words and empties them. If language is a living organism, TechnoLatin words are like those pod people in the movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers. They look real, but they are not. And like the pod people, TechnoLatin has become the norm. Clarity is the exception when it should be the rule. Today we no longer make chips, circuit boards, computers, monitors and printers. We don’t even make products. Instead, we make solutions, a fatuous noun further bloated by empty modifiers such as total, full, seamless, industry standard, and state-of-the-art.

“Equally vague and common are platform, open, environment, and support when used as a verb. A veterinarian using TechnoLatin might say that a dog serves as a platform for sniffing, is an open environment for fleas and that it supports barking.”

Gable PR studied news releases issued during one week over PR Newswire and Business Wire. A new “solution” was promoted or touted every eight minutes on average. More than half the companies claimed to be “leading providers” of something, but never submitted evidence to support the claim.

PR firms and internal PR staff need to strive for clear communications in a human voice and advoid jargon. When clients insist on using favorite phrases against agency advice, the results can be damaging to both company and agency. One WSJ Interactive editor put it into perspective with this thoughtful response to a client-mandated pitch that used “solutions” and a few other TechnoLatin phrases: “No thanks, I’m done covering solutions…I filter out pitches with the word ‘solution’ or ‘solutions’ now…especially ones that are ‘customer-centric’ or ‘mission-critical.’ Please don’t write to me about solutions anymore…they’ve become a problem.”

The answer: the hard but rewarding work of positioning the client properly, then supporting the position with facts, evocative thoughts and even some personality — a proven way to break through the competitive clutter and build an organization’s image and reputation.

Posted by Tom Gable

Cluetrain Manifesto — Wisdom from 1999

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

In an earlier posting about being authentic in Twitter, I mentioned Cluetrain Manifesto, Body of Truth and The New Rules of PR and Marketing as resources for in-depth background on speaking in a human voice and telling better stories. As a great coincidence, I received an email from Simon Owens, who just wrote a story for Media Shift on PBS on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of Cluetrain. Here is the message and a link to his story.

Hey Tom,

I read your post yesterday mentioning the Cluetrain Manifesto. I recently got a chance to interview three of the four authors of the manifesto for a PBS feature I wrote about the book’s 10-year anniversary. They each reflected on the last 10 years and how the rise of Web 2.0 — Twitter, social networking, blogging — fits into the relevancy of what they wrote.

Anyway, I thought this was something you and your readers would find interesting. Take care.

Simon

<snip>

Beyond interesting, Simon’s story gives us pause to think about how we are communicating in old and new ways. It’s worth reviewing a few excerpts from Cluetrain. I’ll do a separate post shortly with a favorite excerpt from Cluetrain on jargon. In the interim, enjoy a few highlights.

The Cluetrain Manifesto¬ – Rick Levine, Christopher Locke, Doc Searls, David Weinberger, Perseus Books, New York

Introduction

A powerful global conversation has begun. Through the Internet, people are discovering and inventing new ways to share relevant knowledge with blinding speed. As a direct result, markets are getting smarter-and getting smarter faster than most companies.

Unlike the lockstep conformity imposed by television, advertising, and corporate propaganda, the Net has given new legitimacy-and free rein-to play. Many of those drawn into this world find themselves exploring a freedom never before imagined: to indulge their curiosity to debate, to disagree, to laugh at themselves, to compare visions, to learn, to create new art, new knowledge.

These new conversations online-whether on the wild and wooly Internet or on (slightly) more sedate corporate intranets-are generating new ways of looking at problems. They are spawning new perspectives, new tools, and a new kind of intellectual bravery more comfortable with risk that with regulation. The result is not just new things learned but a vastly enhanced ability to learn things…

While many such people already work for companies today, most companies ignore their ability to deliver genuine knowledge, opting instead to crank out sterile happytalk that insults the intelligence of markets literally too smart to buy it.

95 Theses (a few highlights)

4. Whether delivering information, opinions, perspectives, dissenting arguments or humorous asides, the human voice is typically open, natural, uncontrived.
5. People recognize each other as such from the sound of this voice.
6. The internet is enabling conversations among human beings that were simply not possible in the era of mass media.
11. People in networked markets have figured out that they get far better information support from one another that from vendors. So much for corporate rhetoric about adding value to commoditized products.
14. Corporations do not speak in the same voice as these new networked conversations. To their intended online audiences, companies sound hollow, flat, literally inhuman.
15. In just a few more years, the current homogenized “voice” of business-the sound of mission statements and brochures-will seem as contrived and artificial as the language of the 18th century French court.
18. Companies that don’t realize their markets are now networked person-to-person, getting smarter as a result and deeply joined in conversation are missing their best opportunity.
21. Companies need to lighten up and take themselves less seriously. They need to get a sense of humor.
22. Getting a sense of humor does not mean putting some jokes on the corporate web site. Rather, it requires big values, a little humility, straight talk, and a genuine point of view.
23. Companies attempting to “position” themselves need to take a position. Optimally, it should relate to something their market actually cares about.
24. Bombastic boasts-”We are positioned to become the preeminent provider of XYZ”-do not constitute a position.
34. To speak with human voice, companies must share the concerns of their communities.
38. Human communities are based on discourse-on human speech about human concerns.
39. The community of discourse is the market.
Companies that do not belong to a community of discourse will die.
43. Such conversations are taking place today on corporate intranets. But only when the conditions are right.
48. When corporate intranets are constrained by fear and legalistic rules, the type of conversation they encourage sounds remarkably like the conversation of the networked marketplace.
61. The inflated self-important jargon your sling around-in the press, at your conferences-what’s that got to do with us?
89. We have real power and we know it. If you don’t quite see the light, some other outfit will come along that’s more attentive, more interesting, more fun to play with.

Posted by Tom Gable